lol, this is a great topic, makes me think about the ol' good vs evil conflict.
In particular reminds me of two films & TV shows.
Based on your essay Shaft, one could argue a vampire is a sort of leech (the need to feed on cumbersome amounts of energy). A leech in society could be considered evil, anti-equal, anti-communal, selfish, etc.
You suggestion that in a way we are all a sort of vampire, is not uncommon.
In The Dark Knight film, the joker is supposedly the type of vampire you're describing, feeds off the attention from the news/press/batman, with the goal to reveal that all of the 'good' society are just as 'bad' as he is.
In Scarface, Tony Montana, argues, society needs 'the bad guy' to serve as a scapegoat for the truly bad actions society undertakes.
In Television, we've had Buffy and then Angel, a quite literal interpretation of the vampire. Angelus, the lead vampire has 'seen the light' and teaches through violence, that a vampire can be 'good', similarly feeding off the attention from the humans he saves from the 'evil' vampires.
And now, True Blood, the next step. We've seen the vampires, despised them, seen their humanic qualities, now we have to accept them into society. Atleast thats what the show is suggesting. True Blood has again literally presented us with 'the vampire'. 'Good' Sookie has quite easily fallen in love with Bill the 'evil' vampire, but she doesnt percieve Bill as 'evil', she is the metaphorical hand that is supposed to guide society into accepting the vampire community into society, accepting that vampires. But in doing so, one might argue is accepting that 'good' society shares something in common with the 'evil' vampires.
Okay so most of my examples are of vigilantes and half is quite literally incorporates the very stereotypical vampire that Shaft is trying to sway away from (the immortality, fast movement, special powers, etc).
What does everyonelse think? |