Quote:
Originally Posted by Dtrtwing Everyone seems to be really impressed with Windows 7. I can't say the same. Wish i could but from what i see its not really any better then Vista. To me this is going to be a rehash of what Microsoft did some years ago with Windows ME.
Its basically a way to get people to pay twice. Instead of fixing Vista they skip that and charge people to buy Windows 7. I just dont see how fair that is. |
Sorry, I have to totally disagree. I currently run W7 RC, used to run Vista Ultimate but downgraded back to XP Pro MCE.
Performance:
Boot times in Windows 7 have been tweaked considerably. Vista takes an incredibly long time to boot up, whilst Windows 7 cuts that time in half! That's barebones, without any extra services loading at start up.
File copying is faster on Windows 7 than Windows Vista. Vista is terribly slow at copying files less than 1gig, strangely it fairs better than XP at files over 1gig in size but still fails to beat Windows 7 in both tests.
Opening documents eg excel spreadsheets, fare the same results. Vista and XP battle it out, Windows 7 just runs over the top of them.
Networking, I love the changes to networking in W7. I used to have some woe with Vista and with XP with my wireless network, but W7 just made everything seamless. Anyway, Windows 7 trumps Vista for networking too. As it does for Security, Gaming, Mobility..And so on.
Just do some research. Google: 'windows 7 versus vista?' and read what everyone else is doing.
I quoted information from the magazine APC July 2009, but you can read the full article at Techradar.